Browser extensions
Helpers for Chrome, Edge, or similar browsers that improve repeated user actions, data capture, or internal browser-based workflows.
TechneOG builds browser extensions, API connectors, and integration flows that help Irish businesses and remote teams make existing tools work together with less copying, fewer handoffs, and clearer operational behavior.
Helpers for Chrome, Edge, or similar browsers that improve repeated user actions, data capture, or internal browser-based workflows.
Connections that move data between tools, trigger actions, or reduce manual transfer work between platforms.
Extensions to existing systems where there is a practical, supported, or workable route to extend functionality.
Structured movement of information between forms, reporting systems, dashboards, and other operational tools.
TechneOG does not claim official partner status with every platform. The real question is whether there is a practical, documented, or supportable way to work with the system.
Use cases involving Chrome, Edge, and similar extension-capable browsers where repeated actions need to be simplified or structured.
Platforms that expose useful endpoints, exports, imports, or other workable integration routes.
Private platforms or internal systems that need a connector, plugin-style layer, or a better handoff between stages.
Clarify where data starts, who controls access, and what permissions exist.
Map what needs to move, when it should move, and what should happen if something fails.
Create the extension, plugin, or system connection around the agreed process.
Check permissions, reliability, and later improvements once the first version is in use.
Package levels help frame complexity. Broader multi-system work, restricted platform access, or more demanding permissions models may require a custom quote.
A focused extension or simple integration with one clear handoff point.
A more developed integration or extension with richer handling and stronger workflow structure.
A broader integration build for more complex system relationships, richer permission handling, or larger workflow automation.
Extensions and integrations should request and use only the access that makes sense for the defined workflow.
Some systems are easy to integrate with, while others impose restrictions through documentation gaps, limited APIs, or permission rules.
Post-launch monitoring, later endpoint changes, and follow-on refinements can be discussed if the integration becomes central to operations.
Not automatically. The practicality depends on the workflow, the browser environment, and whether the site or platform can be worked with safely and reliably.
Sometimes yes, but broader multi-system handoffs are usually a sign that the project should be scoped as a more advanced custom quote.
That becomes part of the feasibility discussion. The safest answer depends on the real access path, documentation, permissions, and the level of reliability required.
If the workflow crosses several systems or requires careful permissions planning, use the contact page for a custom integration discussion.